State of the German POP inventory

Last updated on 24 Jan 2013 17:05 by Kevin Hausmann

Generally, and despite a lot of improvements implemented in recent years, the German POP inventory is still incomplete. There are some source categories missing, in particular those where data availability is an issue. Measurement data for POP emission factors is hard to come by, and where available these are regularly annotated with high uncertainties. Moreover, creating consistent time series for POP emission factors is challenging, even for sources with EFs measured recently, since historic data (e.g. for 1990) is even harder to find.

Current reporting

The quality of reporting varies greatly inside the POP inventory, depending on the (group of) pollutant in question:

Dioxins/ Furans

Due to current legislation, data availability is relatively good. There are measurement data for waste incineration plants and steel industry installations both for 1990 and current years. Therefore, the two most important sources are well covered.
For small combustion (in particular wood), where total activity and emissions increased in recent years, measurement data is available. These emission factors come with high uncertainties, since dioxin emissions depend largely on the fuel used and on combustion conditions. Since we have to cover about 9 million small wood combustion installations in Germany, it is hard to model a consistent usage pattern.
Despite these problems, the German POP inventory is reasonably complete for dioxins and furans. The only known missing sources are small scale waste burning (in particular gardening waste burning) and accidental fires (which are very hard to quantify regarding dioxin emissions). Both small scale waste burning and fires are considered to show a decreasing trend and to be less common then in other counties.

PAHs

PAHs result from incomplete combustion. The by far most important source category in the German inventory for PAHs is small combustion. The same problems as for dioxins apply: emission factors are available but show high uncertainties, usage pattern are hard to model and regulate.
Other sources include steel and mineral industry, power plants, and waste incineration plants. The quality of emission factors for these categories is very diverse. Moreover, different PAHs are given for different sectors (Borneff, US EPA, or others). For the 4 expected single substances, very few data are available, with the possible exception of benzo(a)pyrene. As a result, the PAHs emissions in the inventory are likely to be overestimated.
Overall, the German PAH inventory is quite complete, since most emission come from relatively well regulated combustion processes. As for dioxins and furans, small scale waste burning and forest fires are not covered.

HCB

Data availability for HCB is considerably worse than for dioxins/furans and PAHs. The pollutant is currently not measured at installations, since it is not subject to regulation. Therefore, the German inventory uses mainly default factors from the EEA/EMEP Guidebook, which do not fit well into time series. In addition, some important sources are missing, such as HCB emission from smoke munitions and from pesticide use. For pesticides activity data is only available since 2003. Other categories that might have HCB emission, but are currently not covered due to missing measurements include chemical industry, metal industry and cement production.

PCBs

PCBs from waste incineration is well covered and regularly measured at facility level due to current legislation. Data availability is appropriate. For other industry sectors very few measurements are taken and, again, have considerable uncertainties. In particular information for 1990 is hard to come by, rendering the creation of a consistent time series a tough task.
All together, the data availability is slightly better than for HCBs. Nevertheless, the PCB inventory is still incomplete and misses out on probably important source categories.

Future improvements

The first step towards an improved German POP inventory is to thoroughly check existing information (mainly EFs), to bring these up to date and to identify sources and pollutant combinations that need new measurements most.
Correlation to immission data (POP trends measured in the local environment) can help to check for trends to be expected for each pollutant. Examination of regional differences in immission data can also give clues pointing at key categories.
Working closely with the industry, the German inventory team already had the chance to improve some sources and acquire measurement result for some categories (e.g. HCB from waste incineration and the copper industry). This work should continue. More generally, the goal should be to carry out new measurements in respect to the priorities identified in step 1. This is of course subject to resource availability, since POP measurements are quite expensive. The new measurements should cover the whole spectrum of POPs in order to get a consistent resulting inventory. More knowledge on the relationship between different POPs (in terms of values for emission factors) would possibly allow to close gaps and to infer on historic values currently not available.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License